CZ’s Big Claim: Are Nations Really Printing Unlimited Money to Buy Bitcoin?

In late September 2025, a claim began spreading across social media that caught the attention of crypto enthusiasts everywhere. According to a viral post, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (commonly known as CZ) suggested that nations might resort to printing unlimited amounts of fiat currency in order to buy Bitcoin. The statement, positions Bitcoin as a kind of “digital gold” that governments may seek to stockpile in an age where inflation and debt dominate headlines.

The idea has sparked intense debate, is this a bold vision of Bitcoin’s future, or just another case of market rumors inflating hopes and prices?

Bitcoin is designed with a strict supply limit of 21 million coins. No matter how much demand grows, more Bitcoin cannot be created. Traditional currencies such as the dollar or euro, on the other hand, can be printed in unlimited quantities by central banks. This contrast makes Bitcoin attractive to people who fear inflation or government overspending.

If nations truly decided to print money just to accumulate Bitcoin, it would signal a massive shift in how global economies treat digital assets. It would also raise serious concerns about inflation in traditional currencies, since printing more money usually reduces purchasing power over time. For Bitcoin holders, the idea feels like a dream scenario demand would skyrocket, and so would the price.

Bitcoin is trading near the $111,771 mark, already riding momentum from strong institutional inflows and growing global adoption. Analysts noted that if the narrative of “nations printing for Bitcoin” gains traction, it could quickly push the price higher.

Reactions to the claim have been divided. Supporters argue that it makes sense: countries under pressure from debt and inflation may eventually seek Bitcoin as a safer reserve asset, just as gold was once stockpiled. They see this as the next logical step in Bitcoin’s journey to mainstream acceptance. Skeptics, however, point to the lack of evidence. They argue that bold statements with no proof often create volatility in the market, benefiting short-term traders while leaving long-term investors exposed to unnecessary risk. They compare it to previous situations where tweets or rumors sent coins soaring temporarily, only for prices to collapse afterward.

Comparing the Possible Outcomes

Governments have long relied on money printing as a tool to manage debt and stimulate economies. But unlimited printing can erode trust in currency. Bitcoin, by design, offers an alternative, a fixed-supply asset that cannot be manipulated in the same way. For Bitcoin supporters, CZ’s alleged statement feels like validation of what they have believed for years. For critics, it looks like another rumor designed to spark excitement without substance. Both sides agree on one point, however: the role of Bitcoin in global finance is growing too large to ignore.

In the end, the idea highlights one of the most important discussions in today’s economy, should trust remain in government-issued money, or shift toward scarce digital assets like Bitcoin?