The American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers (AACRAO) released a survey on current educational trends. With its 11,000 higher education professional members, they aim to improve record management in educational institutions. Blockchain verifiable credentials were not on the list.
The key takeaway is the need for educational credentials to go paperless. The paper-based processes are not efficient because the document cannot be reused, is time-consuming, and can be duplicated easily. Although digital credentials have been there for almost 30 years, the pandemic has forced institutions to make a shift towards digitization.
Did you know according to a survey, 32% of institutions plan to devote more resources to credential digitization? Most of the processes carried out at colleges and universities are paper-based. AARCO surveyed the use of four digital credentials technologies those are digitally signed PDFs, digital badges, electronic data exchange, and blockchain verifiable credentials. The major goal is to establish an effective environment for students to share their credentials with prospective employers. Also, read – How Will The Metaverse Developers Change Education?
As of now, there is a huge gap in the adoption rates of these technologies. And obviously, PDFs are the most common electronic credential, which are made machine-readable by 4% of institutions. When institutions were surveyed about the likelihood of executing new digital credentials in the next 12-24 months, only 14% of institutions are interested. Moreover, Blockchain credentials are spreading widely. The institutions have already executed the transfer of credit solutions.
Stay informed with daily updates from Blockchain Magazine on Google News. Click here to follow us and mark as favorite: [Blockchain Magazine on Google News].
Disclaimer: Any post shared by a third-party agency are sponsored and Blockchain Magazine has no views on any such posts. The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the clients and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blockchain Magazine. The information provided in this post is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial, investment, or professional advice. Blockchain Magazine does not endorse or promote any specific products, services, or companies mentioned in this posts. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions.