Tornado Cash Verdict – Developer Roman Storm Found Guilty in Partial Verdict

On August 6, 2025, a U.S. federal jury reached a partial verdict in the high-profile case against Roman Storm, a lead developer of Tornado Cash, a decentralized privacy protocol for cryptocurrency transactions. While the jury convicted Storm on charges of operating an unlicensed money transmitting business, they deadlocked on more severe accusations related to money laundering and sanctions violations.

This verdict reverberates globally, influencing how regulators treat privacy tools and the liability that coordinators of decentralized projects may face.

What is Tornado Cash and Why Is It Controversial?

Tornado Cash is a privacy mixer deployed on Ethereum and other chains that breaks the on-chain linkage between sender and receiver addresses by obfuscating transaction trails. Privacy advocates view it as essential for fungibility and user anonymity; critics cite its use by hackers and sanctioned entities including North Korea’s Lazarus Group.

Charges Against Roman Storm

• Operating an unlicensed money transmitting business (unlicensed MSB activity)

• Conspiracy to commit money laundering

• Conspiracy to violate international sanctions

Prosecutors allege that Tornado Cash processed over $1 billion illicitly, enabling money laundering, including by sanctioned entities.

Read More: What’s Pig Butchering and Are you at Risk ?

Key Aspects of the Verdict

• Guilty on Unlicensed Money Transmission:
  Establishes that operating a privacy protocol can constitute a regulated financial service subject to licensing requirements.

• No Verdict on Money Laundering/Sanctions:
  Jury deadlocked, meaning these counts remain unresolved with potential retrial.

• Legal Implications for Developers:
  Raises concerns about developer liability where decentralized tools can be used illicitly, even if the developers claim no wrongdoing.

Implications for Crypto Privacy

1. Risk for Privacy Tool Developers:
   Tools enabling financial privacy face increasing scrutiny as regulators demand more accountability.

2. Chilling Effect on Open-Source Innovation?
   There’s debate whether criminal charges against protocol contributors may disincentivize beneficial privacy projects.

3. Striking a Balance:
   This trial highlights the global challenge of balancing privacy rights and compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CFT) regulations.

What’s Next?

• Sentencing for Roman Storm pending for the guilty charge.

• Possible retrial on outstanding counts.

• Wider regulatory scrutiny expected toward privacy-focused DeFi tools.

The Tornado Cash verdict marks a critical moment at the intersection of privacy, security, and regulation in crypto. It underscores the ongoing tension between enabling privacy and preventing illicit use and signals enhanced risks for developers of decentralized financial technologies.